Acest site necesită browser-ul să fie activat JavaScript.
Vă rugăm să activați JavaScript și să reîncărcați această pagină.
Site-ul necesită browser-ul pentru a activa cookie-urile pentru a se autentifica.
Vă rugăm să activați cookie-urile și reîncărcați această pagină.
Carte romana
Carte rusa
Carte engleza
Vezi toate cartile
Top branduri cosmetica
Cosmetica Coreeana
Machiaj
Ingrijire ten
Ingrijire par
Ingrijire corp
Produse de baie
Igiena orala
Igiena intima
Igiena sexuala
Cosmetice barbati
Seturi cadou
Naturale si organice
Vezi toate cosmeticele
Top branduri dermatocosmetica
Protectie solara
Seturi cadou si pachete promo
Parfumuri pentru femei
Top branduri femei
Premium brands femei
Parfumuri unisex
Vezi toate parfumurile
Parfumuri pentru barbati
Top branduri barbati
Premium brands barbati
Jucarii si jocuri
Hrana si articole copii
Scutece si servetele
Rechizite si papetarie
Vezi toate produsele
Nutritie & Suplimente
Branduri
Erwin ChemerinskyPresumed Guilty: How the Supreme Court Empowered the Police and Subverted Civil Rights, Hardcover
în Pickup Point de la 599.99 MDL
în 14 de zile
înainte de plată
Today in the United States, much attention is focused on the enormous problems of police violence and racism in law enforcement. Too often, though, that attention fails to place the blame where it most belongs, on the courts, and specifically, on the Supreme Court. A "smoking gun" of civil rights research, Presumed Guilty presents a groundbreaking, decades-long history of judicial failure in America, revealing how the Supreme Court has enabled racist practices, including profiling and intimidation, and legitimated gross law enforcement excesses that disproportionately affect people of color.
For the greater part of its existence, Chemerinsky shows, deference to and empowerment of the police have been the modi operandi of the Supreme Court. From its conception in the late eighteenth century until the Warren Court in 1953, the Supreme Court rarely ruled against the police, and then only when police conduct was truly shocking. Animating seminal cases and justices from the Court's history, Chemerinsky--who has himself litigated cases dealing with police misconduct for decades--shows how the Court has time and again refused to impose constitutional checks on police, all the while deliberately gutting remedies Americans might use to challenge police misconduct.
Finally, in an unprecedented series of landmark rulings in the mid-1950s and 1960s, the pro-defendant Warren Court imposed significant constitutional limits on policing. Yet as Chemerinsky demonstrates, the Warren Court was but a brief historical aberration, a fleeting liberal era that ultimately concluded with Nixon's presidency and the ascendance of conservative and "originalist" justices, whose rulings--in Terry v. Ohio (1968), City of Los Angeles v. Lyons (1983), and Whren v. United States (1996), among other cases--have sanctioned stop-and-frisks, limited suits to reform police departments, and even abetted the use of lethal chokeholds.
Am aprecia părerea ta! Evaluați acest produs
Nu există comentarii de la alți utilizatori.