Этот веб-сайт требует, чтобы для Вашего браузера был включен JavaScript.
Пожалуйста, включите JavaScript и перезагрузите страницу.
Для веб-сайта требуется, чтобы Ваш браузер разрешил использование файлов cookie для входа в систему.
Пожалуйста, активируйте cookies и перезагрузите страницу.
Carte romana
Carte rusa
Carte engleza
Vezi toate cartile
Top branduri cosmetica
Cosmetica Coreeana
Machiaj
Ingrijire ten
Ingrijire par
Ingrijire corp
Produse de baie
Igiena orala
Igiena intima
Igiena sexuala
Cosmetice barbati
Seturi cadou
Naturale si organice
Vezi toate cosmeticele
Top branduri dermatocosmetica
Protectie solara
Seturi cadou si pachete promo
Parfumuri pentru femei
Top branduri femei
Premium brands femei
Parfumuri unisex
Vezi toate parfumurile
Parfumuri pentru barbati
Top branduri barbati
Premium brands barbati
Jucarii si jocuri
Hrana si articole copii
Scutece si servetele
Rechizite si papetarie
Vezi toate produsele
Nutritie & Suplimente
Branduri
Certificate Cadou
Felicitari
Plicuri
Cutii si Accesorii
Roar Alexander MikalsenConstitutional Challenges to the Drug Law: A Case Study, Paperback
в Пункте приема от 99,9 лей
Даже распечатанный
Перед оплатой
The legitimacy of the prohibition experiment rests on its compatibility with constitutional principles. This is uncontroversial and more than a hundred court decisions have upheld the law in these terms, finding no shelter for drug users or distributors in the U.S. Constitution.
As its toll increases, however, more and more people are questioning the drug war. This is natural. But if there is a problem with prohibition, there must also be a problem with its relationship to constitutional principles, and as its constitutionality again is becoming contested, this case study presents an overview of the reasoning that has been used to uphold a criminalization of drugs.
The result is surprising. As shown, the judiciary's treatment has not only been thin, but constitutional demands have been neglected every time a challenge has reached the courts. Not once have prohibitionists proven the validity of contested premises. Instead, justices have drawn upon prejudice to sustain the status quo, while appellants have been denied an opportunity to challenge the law.
In sum, the study shows that drug policy has evolved unchecked by serious debate. Only a very few have contemplated its constitutional implications from an informed perspective; those who have have unanimously rejected the prohibition argument, and this book explains why.
Мы хотели бы узнать Ваше мнение! Оценить и пересмотреть этот пункт
Нет ни одного отзыва от других пользователей.