Этот веб-сайт требует, чтобы для Вашего браузера был включен JavaScript.
Пожалуйста, включите JavaScript и перезагрузите страницу.
Для веб-сайта требуется, чтобы Ваш браузер разрешил использование файлов cookie для входа в систему.
Пожалуйста, активируйте cookies и перезагрузите страницу.
Carte romana
Carte rusa
Carte engleza
Vezi toate cartile
Top branduri cosmetica
Cosmetica Coreeana
Machiaj
Ingrijire ten
Ingrijire par
Ingrijire corp
Produse de baie
Igiena orala
Igiena intima
Igiena sexuala
Cosmetice barbati
Seturi cadou
Naturale si organice
Vezi toate cosmeticele
Top branduri dermatocosmetica
Protectie solara
Seturi cadou si pachete promo
Parfumuri pentru femei
Top branduri femei
Premium brands femei
Parfumuri unisex
Vezi toate parfumurile
Parfumuri pentru barbati
Top branduri barbati
Premium brands barbati
Jucarii si jocuri
Hrana si articole copii
Scutece si servetele
Rechizite si papetarie
Vezi toate produsele
Nutritie & Suplimente
Branduri
Certificate Cadou
Felicitari
Plicuri
Cutii si Accesorii
James L. StokesburyKorean Short History, Paperback
в Пункте приема от 99,9 лей
Даже распечатанный
Перед оплатой
As pungent and concise as his short histories of both world wars, Stokesbury's survey of "the half war" takes a broad view and seems to leave nothing out but the details. The first third covers the North Korean invasion of June 1950, the Pusan perimeter crisis, MacArthur's master stroke at Inchon and the intervention by Chinese forces that November. At this point, other popular histories of the war reach the three-quarter mark, ending often with a cursory summary of the comparatively undramatic three-and-a-half years required to bring the war to its ambiguous conclusion on July 27, 1953. Stokesbury renders the latter period as interesting as the operational fireworks of the first six months: the Truman-MacArthur controversy; the political limitations on U.S. air power; the need for the Americans to fight the war as cheaply as possible, due to NATO commitments; the prolonged negotiations at Panmunjom over the prisoner-exchange issue; and the effect of the war on the home front. Whether the United States could have/should have stayed out of the war in the first place comes under discussion: "no" on both counts, according to the author.
Мы хотели бы узнать Ваше мнение! Оценить и пересмотреть этот пункт
Нет ни одного отзыва от других пользователей.