Этот веб-сайт требует, чтобы для Вашего браузера был включен JavaScript.
Пожалуйста, включите JavaScript и перезагрузите страницу.
Для веб-сайта требуется, чтобы Ваш браузер разрешил использование файлов cookie для входа в систему.
Пожалуйста, активируйте cookies и перезагрузите страницу.
Carte romana
Carte rusa
Carte engleza
Vezi toate cartile
Top branduri cosmetica
Cosmetica Coreeana
Machiaj
Ingrijire ten
Ingrijire par
Ingrijire corp
Produse de baie
Igiena orala
Igiena intima
Igiena sexuala
Cosmetice barbati
Seturi cadou
Naturale si organice
Vezi toate cosmeticele
Top branduri dermatocosmetica
Protectie solara
Seturi cadou si pachete promo
Parfumuri pentru femei
Top branduri femei
Premium brands femei
Parfumuri unisex
Vezi toate parfumurile
Parfumuri pentru barbati
Top branduri barbati
Premium brands barbati
Jucarii si jocuri
Hrana si articole copii
Scutece si servetele
Rechizite si papetarie
Vezi toate produsele
Nutritie & Suplimente
Branduri
Certificate Cadou
Felicitari
Plicuri
Cutii si Accesorii
Sasha ZouevThe Simulation Unplugged: A Critical Assessment of Bostrom's Simulation Argument, Hardcover
в Пункте приема от 99,9 лей
Даже распечатанный
Перед оплатой
This book provides a critical assessment of Nick Bostrom's simulation argument. The argument states that at least one of these statements must be true:
[P1] Almost all civilizations will not reach a posthuman stage.
[P2] Almost all posthuman civilizations will have no interest in creating ancestor simulations.
[P3] We are almost definitely living in a computer simulation.
I examine the soundness of Bostrom's argument by questioning some of his premises. I then propose a few modifications that address the issues raised. Thereafter, I suggest that Bostrom is wrong to assign equal credence to each outcome. Instead, I argue that outcome [P1] should be given preference because it requires the least amount of speculation and additional assumptions.
Section 1 introduces key concepts and explains why the Simulation Argument is worth our philosophical attention. Section 2 evaluates the two key assumptions underlying Bostrom's argument. Section 3 presents a formal mathematical exposition of the Simulation Argument. This section also discusses several problems with the argument and suggests how they can be overcome. Section 4 looks at each of the three outcomes and discusses how we should best interpret them. I conclude by agreeing with Bostrom that the simulation hypothesis, however unlikely, is fundamentally different from other well-known scepticism scenarios.
Мы хотели бы узнать Ваше мнение! Оценить и пересмотреть этот пункт
Нет ни одного отзыва от других пользователей.