Этот веб-сайт требует, чтобы для Вашего браузера был включен JavaScript.
Пожалуйста, включите JavaScript и перезагрузите страницу.
Для веб-сайта требуется, чтобы Ваш браузер разрешил использование файлов cookie для входа в систему.
Пожалуйста, активируйте cookies и перезагрузите страницу.
Carte romana
Carte rusa
Carte engleza
Vezi toate cartile
Top branduri cosmetica
Cosmetica Coreeana
Machiaj
Ingrijire ten
Ingrijire par
Ingrijire corp
Produse de baie
Igiena orala
Igiena intima
Igiena sexuala
Cosmetice barbati
Seturi cadou
Naturale si organice
Vezi toate cosmeticele
Top branduri dermatocosmetica
Protectie solara
Seturi cadou si pachete promo
Parfumuri pentru femei
Top branduri femei
Premium brands femei
Parfumuri unisex
Vezi toate parfumurile
Parfumuri pentru barbati
Top branduri barbati
Premium brands barbati
Jucarii si jocuri
Hrana si articole copii
Scutece si servetele
Rechizite si papetarie
Vezi toate produsele
Nutritie & Suplimente
Branduri
Certificate Cadou
Felicitari
Plicuri
Cutii si Accesorii
Tanisha M. FazalWars of Law: Unintended Consequences in the Regulation of Armed Conflict, Hardcover
в Пункте приема от 99,9 лей
Даже распечатанный
Перед оплатой
In Wars of Law, Tanisha M. Fazal assesses the unintended consequences of the proliferation of the laws of war for the commencement, conduct, and conclusion of wars over the course of the past one hundred fifty years.
After a brief history of the codification of international humanitarian law (IHL), Fazal outlines three main arguments: early laws of war favored belligerents but more recent additions have constrained them; this shift may be attributable to a growing divide between lawmakers and those who must comply with IHL; and lawmakers have been consistently inattentive to how rebel groups might receive these laws.
By using the laws of war strategically, Fazal suggests, belligerents in both interstate and civil wars relate those laws to their big-picture goals. In Wars of Law, we learn that, as codified IHL proliferates and changes in character--with an ever-greater focus on protected persons--states fighting interstate wars become increasingly reluctant to step over any bright lines that unequivocally oblige them to comply with IHL. On the other hand, Fazal argues, secessionists fighting wars for independence are more likely to engage with the laws of war because they have strong incentives to persuade the international community that, if admitted to the club of states, they will be good and capable members of that club.
Why have states stopped issuing formal declarations of war? Why have states stopped concluding formal peace treaties? Why are civil wars especially likely to end in peace treaties today? Addressing such basic questions about international conflict, Fazal provides a lively and intriguing account of the implications of the laws of war.
Мы хотели бы узнать Ваше мнение! Оценить и пересмотреть этот пункт
Нет ни одного отзыва от других пользователей.